And to their credit, nobody has done it better than ESPN.
Earlier in my life this stuff would upset me, but now?
I need more of it.
This is what I’m talking about baby.
Do you know what a blessing that is?
You heard Bobby Marks.
The Knicks have the best starting 5 in the NBA.
I suppose this is what ESPN wanted instead of Zach Lowe, so again I thank them for it.
So let’s dive into ol' Bobby Marks' declaration.
First, it’s wrong.
How did they do?
The Celts are quite literally, the best-rated starting five in the NBA.
What makes them so tough is of course there is no real weakness to attack defensively.
Yes, KAT is an elite stretch 5, something that will help create space and make them better.
But….that’s only a part of the equation.
Defensively, they now have not one, but two players you’re free to target.
Offensively, Brunson is really the only creator in that starting 5.
They are more C&S/off ball-jot down players.
Just think about it logically.
Adding an elite offensive 7fter who provides a skillet that lineup needed will make them better in certain areas.
That’s the thing, once we get to that time of year, everything is about matchups.
You add that unicorn and they frankly become untouchable, as we just saw.
Unless of course, you’re Bobby Marks and ESPN.
It’s easy to talk like this when the games aren’t being played.
